City / Traffic Planning

With this survey, we will assess the solutions from the greater Turku region. You are supposed to assess all the solutions to the best of your abilities as a representative of an organization responsible for planning mobility in the area affected by this mobility service in the greater Turku region – no exact numbers or data searching should be required. Some of the statements may not be so relevant for a particular solution, but since we will build an online database of different solutions from the Baltic Sea Region, we need answers for all the questions.

Decreased Slightly decreased Neutral Slightly increased Increased No opinion
1. Has the solution affected the perceived access to mobility in the area?
2. Has the solution changed the number of easy to use combinations of transport means for the users in the area?
3. Has the solution affected the use of human-powered transport in the area?
4. Has the solution affected the air polluting emissions of transport in the area?
5. Has the solution affected noise pollution of transport in the area?
6. Has the solution affected transport accidents and fatalities in the area?
7. Has the solution affected the perceived risk of crime in the transport of the area?
8. Has the solution affected the accessibility of the essential functions for residents of the area?
9. Has the solution affected congestion and delays in the transport system of the area of interest?
10. Has the solution affected the energy efficiency of transport in the area?
11. Has the solution changed the need for parking spaces in the area?
12. Has the solution affected vehicle or ride-sharing in the area?
13. Has the solution changed the number of mobility options connected to the public transport offering in the area?
14. Has the implementation of the mobility solution changed the acceptance of the solution among the policymakers of the area?
15. Has the solution changed the need for new or improved public infrastructure in the area to be successful?
16. Has the solution changed the amount of information available to different actors and facilitated the creation of new Value-adding services using the same information?

1. Has the solution affected the perceived access to mobility in the area?

2. Has the solution changed the number of easy to use combinations of transport means for the users in the area?

3. Has the solution affected the use of human-powered transport in the area?

4. Has the solution affected the air polluting emissions of transport in the area?

5. Has the solution affected noise pollution of transport in the area?

6. Has the solution affected transport accidents and fatalities in the area?

7. Has the solution affected the perceived risk of crime in the transport of the area?

8. Has the solution affected the accessibility of the essential functions for residents of the area?

9. Has the solution affected congestion and delays in the transport system of the area of interest?

10. Has the solution affected the energy efficiency of transport in the area?

11. Has the solution changed the need for parking spaces in the area?

12. Has the solution affected vehicle or ride-sharing in the area?

13. Has the solution changed the number of mobility options connected to the public transport offering in the area?

14. Has the implementation of the mobility solution changed the acceptance of the solution among the policymakers of the area?

15. Has the solution changed the need for new or improved public infrastructure in the area to be successful?

16. Has the solution changed the amount of information available to different actors and facilitated the creation of new Value-adding services using the same information?